SUREPALLI NANDA
M. A. Wahid – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Heard Sri G. Siva, learned Senior Designate Counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and learned Counsel Smt. Tara Sharma, appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. Petitioners approached the Court seeking the prayer as under:
(a) Calling for all the relevant and connected records relating to the order in award dated 24.09.2015 in I.D. 7 of 2011 on the file of the Learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad communicated by the Memorandum dated 25.1.2016 by quash or set aside the same holding it as legally unsustainable and suffering from error of jurisdiction.
(b) Consequently declare the action of the Respondent factory in denying the overtime allowance to which the petitioners are entitled to under section 59 of the Factories Act and in its lieu paying a Special Allowance (Fixed amount) as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, violative of the provisions of the Factories Act and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
(c) Further di
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.