Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd. vs Vijay D. Kasbe

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 378

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vijay D. Kasbe – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Shyam Bhandari, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K. Parameshwar, Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, AOR Mr. Yash Prashant Sonavane, Adv. Mr. Rohan Darade, Adv. Mr. Lav Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Tushar D. Bhelkar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenging a common order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in a batch of writ petitions affirming an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, holding that even those employees working as Supervisors are entitled to Double Over Time Allowance, the Management of the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India¹ [for short “Corporation”] and others have come up with these appeals.

3. We have heard Shri Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and Shri R.K. Adsure, Shri K. Parameswar and Shri S.S. Deshmukh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. The case on hand has a checkered history with fortunes fluctuating from one side to the other. To the extent necessary, we shall now trace the history as follows:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 378

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHALSecurity Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd. – AppellantVersusVijay D. Kasbe – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Vijay D. Kasbe – Respondent