JUDGMENT :

M.Vankung, J.

Heard Mr. Imti Longjem, learned counsel for the appellant along with Mr. Yangerwati, learned CGSC for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, and Mr. Pfosekho Pfotte, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 to 5.

2. Mr. Imti Longjem, learned counsel for the appellant submits that this appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 09.04.2021 passed in WP(C)/263(K)/2018. The learned counsel submits that the writ petition was filed by the present appellant seeking direction to the respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 to pay the petitioner’s firm for the additional works carried out in the year 2012 in terms of the revised price/rate sanctioned vide letter dated 29.09.2011 which was communicated to the petitioner’s Firm vide letter dated 06.01.2012.

3. The case of the appellant was that the appellant’s Firm participated in the tender process for construction of Phase-A (Pkg-II) buildings for Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV) at Chare, District Tuensang, Nagaland. The scope of the work was mentioned in the Price Bid Document (Volume-II) of the tender document of the contract. The contract was awarded to the appellant’s Firm for a total price of Rs.4,36,01,897.26/-(Rupees Four crores