Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Indian Security Force – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organization – Respondent
ORDER:
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Heard Mr P.U.Bhaskara Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms T.Bala Jayasree, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.
2. The petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking prayer as under:
3. PERUSED THE RECORD
A. The order dated 17.02.2023 passed in the present writ petition, is as under:
Delay in EPF contributions results in automatic penalties under Section 14B, independent of intent, reinforcing the strict liability principle in social welfare legislation.
The delay in EPF remittance does not exempt the employer from penalties, as mens rea is not required for imposing damages under Section 14-B of the Act.
Tribunal's requirement for a 20% pre-deposit under Section 14B of the EPF Act is invalid as no such provision exists for appeals under that section.
Damages for delayed payment under the EPF Act cannot exceed the amount of arrears, and interest cannot be levied on penal amounts without statutory authority.
Mens rea is not required for imposing damages under the EPF Act; damages serve as penalties for defaults and ensure employee benefits, emphasizing the need for reasoned decisions from authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
