K. SARATH
Chavan Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Allampally Surender Reddy – Respondent
ORDER :
K. Sarath, J.
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, questioning the orders passed in I.A.No.3 of 2023 in Case No.A4/CPC/1541/2022 on the file of Additional Agent to Government & Project Officer, ITDA, Adilabad, Headquarters at Utnoor.
2. Heard Sri R. Mangulal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri A. Srinivas, learned Counsel for respondents.
3. The petitioner herein filed suit for injunction on the file of Additional Agent to Government and Project Officer, Integrated Project Development Agency (for short ‘ITDA’) under Order VII, Rule-1, read with Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code and Rule 42 of Agency Rules, 1924 and it was numbered as Case No.A4/CPC/1541/2022. In the said suit, the petitioner filed I.A.No.3 of 2023 in Case No.A4/CPC/1541/2022 to send certain documents to handwriting expert, was dismissed. Being aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
4. At the time hearing the Civil Revision, this Court surprised to see that the Additional Agent to Government & Project Officer, ITDA, Utnoor is entertaining Civil Suits under Telangana Agency Rules, 1924, without having any power and jurisdic
Kodimi Rajamma Vs. Principal Secretary, Home (Courts-A) Department
Makadam Venakteswara Rao and others Vs. Subordiante Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam District and another
The Additional Agent to Government and Project Officer, ITDA, Utnoor, lacked jurisdiction to entertain civil suits under the Telangana Agency Rules, 1924, necessitating their transfer to the appropri....
Rule 18 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Rules, 1975 is valid and consistent with Section 24 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955, affirming th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Civil Court cannot interfere with the decisions of the Competent Authority under the Regulation, and the Suit was not maintainable as the ....
Point of Law : High Court in exercise of certiorari or supervisory jurisdiction will not covert itself into a Court of Appeal and indulge in re-appreciation or evaluation of evidence or correct error....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.