Back
K. SUJANA
Maramreddy Narasimham Narsimha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
K. SUJANA, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short ‘BNSS’) to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 in Crime No.599 of 2024 of Borabanda Police Station, Hyderabad registered for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(n), of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘I.P.C.’).
2. Heard Sri S. Akhilesh Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.2/de facto complainant filed Interlocutory Applications, vide I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024, in the present criminal petition to permit the petitioner and respondent No.2/de facto complainant to compound the offences and to record the compromise, therefore, he prayed the Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in Crime No.599 of 2024, as the matter has been settled amicably.
4. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme court in Major Amrit Yadav vs. State of Telangana 2023 SCC OnLine TS 6
The court cannot quash proceedings for heinous offences like rape based on compromise, emphasizing the serious societal impact of such crimes.
The court cannot quash proceedings for heinous offences like rape, even with a compromise, due to their serious nature and non-compoundable status.
Proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in cases of serious offences when a settlement is reached, provided the likelihood of conviction is minimal and supports the harmonious relationsh....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent an abuse of the process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases whe....
The court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if a voluntary compromise is reached and the likelihood of conviction is deemed remote.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings if a compromise is reached, provided the nature of the crime allows for such action and the possibility of conviction is deemed remote.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of family disputes where the wrong is private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute, the High C....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
