K. SUJANA
Khazi Mohammed Idris Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
(K. Sujana, J.) :
This Criminal Petition is filed under 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in P.R.C.No.14 of 2024 on the file of the learned IV Additional Junior Civil Judgecum-XV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal Malkajgiri District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420 and 376(2)(n), of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘I.P.C.’).
2. Heard Sri Mohammed Afzaluddin Dakhani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.2/de facto complainant filed Interlocutory Applications, vide I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2024, in the present criminal petition to permit the petitioner and respondent No.2/de facto complainant to compound the offences and to record the compromise, therefore, he prayed the Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in P.R.C.No.14 of 2024, as the matter has been settled amicably.
4. In support of his submission, learned counsel for the petitioner relied
The court cannot quash proceedings for heinous offences like rape, even with a compromise, due to their serious nature and non-compoundable status.
The court cannot quash proceedings for heinous offences like rape based on compromise, emphasizing the serious societal impact of such crimes.
Proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in cases of serious offences when a settlement is reached, provided the likelihood of conviction is minimal and supports the harmonious relationsh....
The court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if a voluntary compromise is reached and the likelihood of conviction is deemed remote.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings if a compromise is reached, provided the nature of the crime allows for such action and the possibility of conviction is deemed remote.
The court has the power to quash proceedings even in cases involving heinous and serious offences, considering factors such as the stage of the proceedings, the possibility of conviction, and the imp....
The court may quash proceedings for serious offences if a voluntary compromise exists and the likelihood of conviction is remote, promoting harmony between parties.
Parties can compound offences for serious crimes like rape under unique circumstances, enabling courts to quash proceedings when further prosecution serves no purpose and the victim expresses a desir....
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 where parties have settled their dispute amicably, especially in cases with remote chances of conviction.
The court may quash proceedings in heinous crimes if evidence shows remote chances of conviction and both parties consent to compromise.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.