SUREPALLI NANDA
K. Manyam Konda – Appellant
Versus
TSRTC – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Mr V.Narsimha Goud, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and heard the learned standing counsel Mr B.Mayur Reddy, appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
PERUSED THE RECORD.
3. The relevant portion of the impugned award dated 15th September, 2016 passed in I.D.No.43 of 2013 on the file of Labour Court-III, A.P., Hyderabad (last three paras of the said Award), read as under:
The court emphasized the necessity of providing all relevant documents to a charged employee to ensure a fair opportunity for defense in disciplinary proceedings.
No pay cannot be applied to the present facts of the case, since the petitioner did not attend to work on account of illegal order of suspension and dismissal from service, passed by the appellants h....
The court ruled that failure to provide inquiry reports and examine witnesses violates natural justice, rendering disciplinary actions arbitrary and illegal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.