K. SARATH
Poolla Ananta Arun rep. by his GPA Holder Sri P. Shiva Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Tasleem Abdullah Chougle – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Ms. D. Shalini Shravanthi representing Sri D. Srinivas Prasad, Learned Counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Krishna Uppaluri, representing Sri S. Jasbeer Singh, Learned Counsel for the respondents.
2. This application is filed to appoint a sole arbitrator to decide the claims and disputes between the applicant and the respondents in terms of the arbitration clause in the agreement dated 27.01.2013 and to grant costs of the application to be paid by the respondents to the applicant.
3. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the respondents through their GPA holder has agreed to sell the flat admeasuring 3500 sq. feet in the ground floor in Block A in Tower No.A11 in the apartment known as ‘Grand Luxus” with proportionate undivided share in the land out of the total land admeasuring 8,830.73 sq. yards with three car parking areas in the 5 cellars and a servant quarter forming part of the premises, by way of agreement of sale dated 27.01.2013 for a total sale consideration of Rs.73,50,000/-. The said complex has to be constructed within a period of 24 months with a grace period of 6 months from the date of agreement. If there is delay beyond 30 months inclusive
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and another vs. Nortel Networks India Private Limited
M/s.N.N.Global Mercantile Private Limited vs. M/s.Indo Unique Flame Ltd and others
The court affirmed that an arbitration agreement can be enforced despite issues of insufficient stamping, and clarified the applicable limitation period for arbitration applications.
The existence of an arbitration agreement continues even after the dissolution of a partnership firm, and the right to sue accrues when a party abandons efforts for settlement, from which the limitat....
The court emphasized the importance of invoking arbitration within a reasonable time and held that delay in invoking the arbitration clause can render the application time-barred.
The issue of limitation is a matter for the Arbitrator to decide, and disputes should be referred to the Arbitrator for resolution.
As per Section 11 (13) of the Act now arbitration is required to be decided within 30 days.
The cause of action for the appointment of an arbitrator arises when the named arbitrator refuses to enter arbitration, and the issue of whether claims before the arbitrator are barred by limitation ....
An arbitration application is unenforceable when filed after significant delay and in acknowledgment of prior cancellation of the agreement, thereby lacking an arbitrable dispute.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Limitation Act, 1963 to arbitration proceedings and the significance of acknowledging claims to extend the period of limitat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the limitation for filing an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act arises upon the failure to make the appointment of the arbitr....
The court emphasized the importance of upholding arbitration agreements and referred to the judgment in Pravin Electricals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Galaxy Infra and Engineering Pvt. Ltd. to support the appointm....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.