Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
Venu Swamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Surepalli Nanda, J.
1. Heard Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare, Sri Swaroop Orilla, learned Special Government Pleader representing learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 2 on record and Sri G.V.L.Murthy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 3.
2. The petitioner approached the court seeking the prayer as under:
3. The case of the Petitioner, in brief, as per the averments made in the affidavit filed by the Petitioner in support of the
The Telangana State Women's Commission has the authority to issue summons based on information received without requiring a preliminary investigation, as per Sections 16(1)(b) and 16(3) of the Act.
Failure to follow procedural requirements by the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women invalidated their actions and recommendations, allowing the writ petition.
The Manipur State Commission for Women has the power to entertain complaints and direct parties to appear for inquiry, but not to adjudicate or determine rights like a Court or Tribunal.
The National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes lacks jurisdiction to investigate individual caste status claims, which violates natural justice principles.
Point of Law : Petitioners want the Summons issued by the learned Trial Court to be quashed and set aside simply because in their view the Civil Suit is not maintainable and its filing is an abuse of....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
