ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
Gaffar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
J. Sreenivas Rao, J.
1. W.P.(PIL) No.198 of 2016 is filed questioning the inaction of the respondents in implementing the proceedings No.C1/89/2014 dated 01.05.2015 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer-respondent No.4 to restore the original entries of classification, pattadar and occupant column of the lands in Sy.No.23 (Ac.13.22 gts.) and Sy.No.24 (Ac.36.32 gts.,) totalling Ac.50.14 gts., situated at Mamidigi Village, Nyalkal Mandal, Sanga Reddy Division of Medak District as 'Talab Cheruvu Sarkari', with reference to the Khasra Pahani 1954-55.
1.1. W.P.Nos. 14448 and 14698 of 2015 are filed questioning the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 01.05.2015 vide Proceedings No.C1/89/2014, in respect of land to an extent of Acs.29.37 gts., out of total extent of Ac.50.14 gts.
2. Heard Smt. B.Rachna Reddy, learned senior counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(PIL) No.198 of 2016, Sri P.Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.14448 of 2015, Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.14698 of 2015 and Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of learned Advocate General appearing for th
Peddi Sailaja and another v. State and others (2014) 2 ALD 246
J.Krishnamachari v. State Government of Andhra Pradesh and others 2014 (1) ALD 406
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Singhara Singh and others AIR 1964 SC 358
The Revenue Divisional Officer lacks jurisdiction to exercise suo motu powers under the RoR Act, which is reserved for the Collector, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures.
The main legal point established is the requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing orders under Sec.5(3) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattedar Passb....
The court ruled that while the Revenue Divisional Officer lacked jurisdiction to act suo motu, the Joint Collector's revisional powers were valid in addressing fraudulent claims over government land.
Claims for land ownership after significant delays must be addressed by civil courts, as administrative bodies cannot adjudicate on disputed titles without violating established rights.
The appellate authority under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act has jurisdiction to entertain appeals regarding land title and possession, and the status quo must be maint....
The court affirmed that a revision petition under the ROR Act can be filed without a time limit, emphasizing the need for a fresh enquiry into land ownership claims, especially in cases of alleged fr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.