Back
ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
Gaffar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
J. Sreenivas Rao, J.
1. W.P.(PIL) No.198 of 2016 is filed questioning the inaction of the respondents in implementing the proceedings No.C1/89/2014 dated 01.05.2015 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer-respondent No.4 to restore the original entries of classification, pattadar and occupant column of the lands in Sy.No.23 (Ac.13.22 gts.) and Sy.No.24 (Ac.36.32 gts.,) totalling Ac.50.14 gts., situated at Mamidigi Village, Nyalkal Mandal, Sanga Reddy Division of Medak District as 'Talab Cheruvu Sarkari', with reference to the Khasra Pahani 1954-55.
1.1. W.P.Nos. 14448 and 14698 of 2015 are filed questioning the order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer dated 01.05.2015 vide Proceedings No.C1/89/2014, in respect of land to an extent of Acs.29.37 gts., out of total extent of Ac.50.14 gts.
2. Heard Smt. B.Rachna Reddy, learned senior counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(PIL) No.198 of 2016, Sri P.Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.14448 of 2015, Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.14698 of 2015 and Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader attached to the office of learned Advocate General appearing for th
The Revenue Divisional Officer lacks jurisdiction to exercise suo motu powers under the RoR Act, which is reserved for the Collector, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures.
The main legal point established is the requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing orders under Sec.5(3) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattedar Passb....
The court ruled that while the Revenue Divisional Officer lacked jurisdiction to act suo motu, the Joint Collector's revisional powers were valid in addressing fraudulent claims over government land.
Claims for land ownership after significant delays must be addressed by civil courts, as administrative bodies cannot adjudicate on disputed titles without violating established rights.
The Revenue Divisional Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate applications for land mutation, which must be filed before the Tahsildar according to the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pa....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
