Back
G. RADHA RANI
Mohammed Mahmood – Appellant
Versus
Margadarshi Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. G. Radha Rani, J.
1. This Appeal Suit is filed by the appellants - respondents - D.Hrs. aggrieved by the order in E.A.No.197 of 2019 in E.P.No.163 of 2016 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar in Dispute No.346 of 2012 dated 17.11.2023.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 - Chit Fund Company filed an arbitration case being Dispute No.346 of 2012 before the Deputy Registrar of Chits / Arbitrator, Rangareddy District (West) seeking to recover an amount of Rs.16,41,060/- against respondents 2 to 6 herein. After hearing the matter, an award was passed by the Deputy Registrar of Chits / Arbitrator on 24.08.2013. Pending the above Dispute No.346 of 2012 before the Deputy Registrar, the respondent No.1 filed an application being I.A.No.78 of 2013 seeking attachment of the EP schedule property and the same was allowed by attaching the immovable property of the respondent No.4 - J.Dr. No.3 herein. Subsequently, for execution of the award passed in Dispute No.346 of 2012, the respondent No.1 herein filed an Execution Petition being E.P.No.163 of 2016 seeking sale of EP schedule property, which was already attache
Possession at the time of attachment is critical for claims; ex-parte decrees obtained collusively are not binding on decree holders.
Order 21, Rule 58 CPC deals with adjudication of claims or objections with regard to properties attached either directly or indirectly between the parties to the proceedings.
The doctrine of lis pendens prevents subsequent purchasers from claiming rights over property already subject to a legal decree.
A party cannot assert ownership or set aside property attachments if the property was previously alienated during a court-ordered attachment, regardless of purported ignorance of such order.
The main legal point established is that property conveyed to a Defendant's wife can be attached to satisfy a decree if the conveyance was done to evade execution, and legal heirs are liable to satis....
Satisfaction of the Court is a pre-requisite for grant of conditional attachment under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of CPC. Failure to comply with the requirements of Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of CPC renders th....
Compulsory registration as adumbrated under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, failing which, the claimants/appellants have to face mischief consequences of Section 49 of the Registration Act
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
