Back
K. LAKSHMAN
Yeduguri Sandinti Bhaskar Reddy, S/o Yeduguri Sandinti Chinna Konda Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State, Through Central Bureau of Investigation, represented by its Special Public Prosecutor – Respondent
ORDER :
K. Lakshman, J.
These Criminal Petitions are filed under Sections – 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) to grant regular bail to the petitioners herein/A.6 and A.7 in S.C.No.1 of 2023 pending on the file of Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad. The offences alleged against them are punishable under sections 120-B read with Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’).
2. Heard Sri T.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.3044 of 2024, Sri Ch.Siddardha Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.3046 of 2024, Sri Anilkumar Tenwar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI and Sri B.Nalin Kunar, learned Senior counsel representing Ms.Tekuru Swetcha, learned counsel appearing for 2nd respondent.
3. The petitioner herein are A.6 and A.7 and the offences alleged against them are under Sections 120-B read with Sections 302 and 201 of IPC. The allegations leveled against them are that A.6 is close associate of A.8, A.7 and A.5. As per the investigation conducted by CBI, he was found active in the intervening
The court emphasized the necessity of a fair trial under Article 21, highlighting the risk of witness tampering due to the petitioners' influential status, leading to the dismissal of A.6's bail and ....
Point of Law : Right of the accused to claim bail on account of default committed by the prosecuting agency in completing the investigation within the time stipulated in the statute is a statutory ri....
The court determined that prolonged detention does not automatically entitle an accused to bail when substantial evidence of guilt exists, underscoring the rights to a speedy trial within serious cri....
Point of law : discretion for grant of bail must be exercised cautiously while considering the bail petitions of the nature being dealt with.
The court affirmed that under Section 437(6) of the CrPC, the magistrate's discretion in denying bail is contingent upon justifiable reasons, balancing trial delays against the need to preserve justi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, especially in cases where there is delay in concluding the trial and no conclusive evidence connect....
Under UA(P) Act Section 43D(5), bail denied if charge-sheet shows prima facie true accusations of terrorist gang involvement; custody/delay insufficient absent changed circumstances; parity only for ....
The decision emphasized the importance of considering the nature of the offence, severity of the punishment, and the likelihood of the accused interfering with the process of justice when deciding on....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
