Kundan Kumar, s/o. Hari Giri vs National Investigation Agency, New Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Abhinay Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate, Mr. Vineet Sin

Table of Content
1. appeal against nia bail rejection order. (Para 1 , 2)
2. attack on police, vehicle burning, extortion conspiracy. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. charge-sheet filing and repeated bail denials. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. no incriminating evidence; parity; long custody. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. arms recovery; similar to akash roy; uapa jail rule. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
6. recap of incident, investigation, charge-sheet evidence. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34)
7. prior bail rejection; no new circumstances. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
8. uapa s43d(5) stringent bail conditions. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
9. delay not ground for uapa bail. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
10. trial progress; tampering risk. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
11. co-accused bails listed. (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
12. parity requires identical roles. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69)
13. appellant complicity matches akash roy. (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77)
14. appeal dismissed; prima facie case holds. (Para 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83)

Judgment :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

Prayer:

1. The instant appeal preferred under Section 2