Back
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
Mohd Bin Salam – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This writ petition is filed declaring impugned Memo No.18496/Arms/2016 dated 06.01.2018 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and voilative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also against the provisions of Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner also sought for a consequential direction to the respondents to renew his Arms Licence pertaining to the weapons i.e., (1) .32 NPB Revolver No.B-73534 (2) 12 Bore DBBL Gun No.G-51904 and (3) .22 Rifle No.93101137w.
2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was given arms licence in the year 1991 for possessing three weapons i.e., (1) .32 NPB Revolver No.B-73534 (2) 12 Bore DBBL Gun No.G-51904 and (3) .22 Rifle No.93101137w. The said licence was renewed from time to time. It is stated that whenever the respondent police demanded and instructed the petitioner to surrender and deposit the weapons, the petitioner obeyed and deposited the weapons before the concerned authorized police station or authorized depository. While so, a show-cause notice dated 26.05.2011 was issued calling upon the petitioner to explain why his arms licence should not be cancelled. In the said show-cause notice, it is stated that the
An order passed by a licensing authority following a remand by an appellate authority creates a fresh cause of action, rendering any subsequent challenge to that order a valid original appeal rather ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
