Back
UJJAL BHUYAN, SUREPALLI NANDA
Pulimamidi Shashidhar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Surepalli Nanda, J.
Heard K.V. Rajasree, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri E. Madan Mohan Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 8, Sri R. Balasubrahmanyam, learned counsel in the implead petition, and learned Government Pleader for Assignment.
2. The present writ petition has been filed in the form of Public Interest Litigation seeking the following relief.
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows :
Land Scam - 'Public Interest Litigation' – Not maintainable - PIL to be genuine Public Interest, not a publicity petition, politically motivated by third party, private interest or with any other mot....
Judicial intervention in land disputes requires a factual determination inappropriate for writ jurisdiction; remedies should be pursued through proper administrative appeals.
(1) Public Interest Litigation – Generally, PIL, being a summary jurisdiction, has limited powers to examine bonafides of parties – It is usually on pleadings that Court should take a prima facie vie....
Public Interest Litigations must be filed by individuals with clean hands and bona fide intentions; failure to disclose criminal antecedents can lead to dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
