IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
D. NAGARJUN, J.
Smt. Rapolu Shobha, Warangal Dt. - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Telangana, Rep PP and Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Petition No.766 of 2016
Decided On : 13-09-2022
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482, 156 (3), 200 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 504, 34 – Offence of cheating - Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace - Petition is filed by petitioner to quash Crime – Held, There are allegations against petitioner-accused No.2, which require further probe and investigation and without there being any investigation, at this preliminary stage, Court cannot record a finding that petitioner-accused No.2 has not committed any offence - In case, if investigation is done, may be Police will give clear chit to petitioner that she has not committed any offence and may be Police would file charge sheet with more strong evidence to show that petitioner has committed offence - Therefore, investigating agency shall be permitted to continue investigation and in case if petitioner-accused No.2 feels that investigation is not on proper lines, then certainly petitioner will be at liberty to challenge charge sheet under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure - Petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner-accused No.2 to quash Crime No.113 of 2015 of Lingala Ghanpur Police Station registered for the offences under Sections 420 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The basis for the Police, Lingala Ghanpur to register the case against the petitioner-accused No.2 is private complaint filed by the respondent No2-de-facto complainant before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jangaon, which was forwarded to Police Station for further investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The facts in brief as per the private complaint filed before the trial Court under Section 200 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure is as under:
b) Accused No.1 with criminal intention and in order to cause wrongful loss on account of increase in the prices of land properties, conspired with petitioner-accused No.2 having monetary dealings joined with her to snatch away the land of the respondent No.2 and executed a registered sale deed bearing document No.3685 of 2015 dated 22.05.2015 against the clause in the GPA, wherein GPA holder is expected to executed sale deed only in the name of person, who is nominated by M/s. Country Club (India) Limited. Basing on the said private complaint, the Police have registered a case in Crime No.113 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 420 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
c) Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed by petitioner-accused No.2 seeking quahsment of FIR on the following grounds:
i) The petitioner-accused No.2 is innocent. Respondent No. 2 has converted civil dispute into criminal case with baseless allegations. Even if the contents of complaint are accepted to be true, the offence under Sections 420 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code will not be attracted.
ii) Accused No.1 the GPA holder has obtained consent letter from M/s. Country Club (India) Limited to sell the land basing on which he has executed registered sale deed in favour of the petitioner vide document No.3681 of 2015 dated 22-05-2015 and thereby accused No.2 has not committed any offence.
iii) The dispute between respondent No.2 and petitioner No.1 is civil in nature and if at all the respondent No.12 has got any grievance, he shall approach competent civil court and therefore criminal case cannot be entertained.
3. Respondent No.2 has filed counter through his counsel stating that the averments of the complaint clearly shows that the petitioner has committed offence punishable under Sections 420 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Unless enquiry is completed by the Police, the truth or oth
The court ruled that ongoing civil litigation does not preclude criminal prosecutions where sufficient evidence indicates dishonest intent constituting an offence under Section 420 IPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle that the continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to an abuse of process of the Court, especially in the presence of pending....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.