SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 623

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
D. NAGARJUN, J.
Smt. Rapolu Shobha, Warangal Dt. - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Telangana, Rep PP and Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Petition No.766 of 2016
Decided On : 13-09-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: C. Damodar Reddy.

Headnote:

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482, 156 (3), 200 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 504, 34 – Offence of cheating - Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace - Petition is filed by petitioner to quash Crime – Held, There are allegations against petitioner-accused No.2, which require further probe and investigation and without there being any investigation, at this preliminary stage, Court cannot record a finding that petitioner-accused No.2 has not committed any offence - In case, if investigation is done, may be Police will give clear chit to petitioner that she has not committed any offence and may be Police would file charge sheet with more strong evidence to show that petitioner has committed offence - Therefore, investigating agency shall be permitted to continue investigation and in case if petitioner-accused No.2 feels that investigation is not on proper lines, then certainly petitioner will be at liberty to challenge charge sheet under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure - Petition is dismissed.

ORDER :

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioner-accused No.2 to quash Crime No.113 of 2015 of Lingala Ghanpur Police Station registered for the offences under Sections 420 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The basis for the Police, Lingala Ghanpur to register the case against the petitioner-accused No.2 is private complaint filed by the respondent No2-de-facto complainant before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jangaon, which was forwarded to Police Station for further investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The facts in brief as per the private complaint filed before the trial Court under Section 200 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure is as under:

    a) Respondent No.2 is the owner and possessor of land property to the extent of Ac.5.37 guntas i.e., Ac.1.04 guntas in Sy.No.540/B, Ac.2.29 guntas in Sy.No.540/A, Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.546/B, Ac.0.07 guntas in Sy.No.547/A, Ac.0.18 guntas in Sy.No.546/A, B and Ac.0.19 guntas in Sy.No.546 of Bandlagudem H/o. Lingala Ghanapur of Warangal District. The said lands were purchased under registered sale deed bearing document Nos. 1479 of 2008, 2186 of 2008, 2187 of 2008, 4161 of 2008 and 4565 of 2008. After purchase, the name of respondent No.2 was also recorded as owner on revenue records. Pattadar passbooks and title deed passbooks were also given in favour of respondent No.2 and he has been in peaceful possession of the property since the date of purchase. Respondent No.2 along with other land owners have jointly formed a layout including the property belonging to respondent No.2 and they have given a GPA in favour of Linga Murthy i.e., accused No.1 herein vide document bearing No. BK-IV 7/2011 dated 16.03.2011. As per the said GPA, accused No.1 is expected to execute registered sale deed in favour of person nominated by M/s. Country Club (India) Limited in whose favour residential plots have been allotted by M/s. Country Club (India) Limited or M/s. Country Condos Limited.

b) Accused No.1 with criminal intention and in order to cause wrongful loss on account of increase in the prices of land properties, conspired with petitioner-accused No.2 having monetary dealings joined with her to snatch away the land of the respondent No.2 and executed a registered sale deed bearing document No.3685 of 2015 dated 22.05.2015 against the clause in the GPA, wherein GPA holder is expected to executed sale deed only in the name of person, who is nominated by M/s. Country Club (India) Limited. Basing on the said private complaint, the Police have registered a case in Crime No.113 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 420 and 504 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

c) Aggrieved by the same, the present petition is filed by petitioner-accused No.2 seeking quahsment of FIR on the following grounds:

i) The petitioner-accused No.2 is innocent. Respondent No. 2 has converted civil dispute into criminal case with baseless allegations. Even if the contents of complaint are accepted to be true, the offence under Sections 420 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code will not be attracted.

ii) Accused No.1 the GPA holder has obtained consent letter from M/s. Country Club (India) Limited to sell the land basing on which he has executed registered sale deed in favour of the petitioner vide document No.3681 of 2015 dated 22-05-2015 and thereby accused No.2 has not committed any offence.

iii) The dispute between respondent No.2 and petitioner No.1 is civil in nature and if at all the respondent No.12 has got any grievance, he shall approach competent civil court and therefore criminal case cannot be entertained.

3. Respondent No.2 has filed counter through his counsel stating that the averments of the complaint clearly shows that the petitioner has committed offence punishable under Sections 420 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Unless enquiry is completed by the Police, the truth or oth

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top