SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 383

M. G. PRIYADARSINI
Kanchu Hemanya Shanmukapriya – Appellant
Versus
Suggala Vijayalaxmi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: C. Mohan Prakash.

JUDGMENT :

Being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded in the award and decree, dated 07.02.2019 made in M.V.O.P.No.1035 of 2014 on the file of the XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the Tribunal”), the appellant/claimant preferred the present appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the minor appellant through her father, filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by her in a road accident that occurred on 09.02.2014. According to the appellant, on 09.02.2014 while she was returning to her house at 3rd Incline of Kothagudem Town, one Auto Trolley bearing No.AP 37 TC 3981, owned by respondent No.1 and insured with respondent No.2, being driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner at high speed, dashed the appellant, as a result of which, the appellant sustained fracture to her nasal bone and right femur. Immediately after the accident, the appellant was shifted to Mamata Hospital, Khammam and the fath

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top