Back
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Mumtaz Yarud dowla Wakf – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Rafeeuddin – Respondent
ORDER :
This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 15.09.2017 in I.A.No.139 of 2017 in O.S.No.800 of 2016 (Old O.S.No.24 of 2016) passed by the Telangana State Waqf Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) dismissing the petition filed under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) read with Section 151 C.P.C.
2. The petitioners are defendant 2, 3, 5, 8 to 11, 13, 14 and 15 and they filed an application to reject plaint in O.S.No.24 of 2016 on the sole ground that the respondents/plaintiffs are not interested persons within the definition under Section 3(k) of the Wakf Act, 1995 and that Mumtaz Yaruddowla Wakf is only an educational institution and not Mosque or any other religious trust, to perform prayers etc. by any person. Therefore, the plaintiffs are not interested persons within the definition of Section 3(k) of the Wakf Act and thereby there was no cause of action to file the suit and that it is barred by Section 83(2) of the Wakf Act, 1995.
3. Respondents 1 and 2 filed counter denying material allegations inter alia contending that the petition is filed to circumvent the law and to avoid filing written statement in the main suit
Point of Law : It is therefore evident that despite fact that revisionist was removed from his post as Mutawalli/Secretary of managing committee of waqf, application filed by him under Section 83(2) ....
The rejection of a plaint for lack of cause of action must be substantively justified; merely asserting lack of merit without proper consideration of presented evidence is insufficient.
The definitions of 'interested person' and 'aggrieved person' in the Waqf Act are interrelated, allowing a devotee of a Waqf property to challenge decisions affecting their rights to access and utili....
The property was determined to be Wakf, with sales executed without the Wakf Board's sanction declared void, affirming the Muthavalli's right to maintain the suit.
The irreversibility of wakf property transactions based on the Wakf Act's provisions prohibits alienation, upholding the integrity of religious and charitable purposes over contested claims.
Expression ‘waqf by user’ finding place in Section 3 (r) (i) of the Act is a defined expression and is not qualified by any word to suggest that it has to be of immemorial user, the Court would have ....
The court asserted that ownership disputes under the Wakf Act do not preclude valid claims from individuals claiming title, regardless of Wakf notifications, provided they can substantiate their owne....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
