Back
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Ahale Sunnathwal Jamath Jogi Madam, Majid & Durga Gudiyattam, Represented by its duly appointed Muthavalli S. A. Rahim – Appellant
Versus
Haji Syed Irfan Hussain Sahib (Died) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the judgment and decree dated 17.02.2016 passed by the Hon'ble Wakf Board Tribunal/Subordinate Judge, Vellore, Vellore District in O.S.No.220 of 2008 and consequently allow the aforesaid O.S.No.220 of 2008.)
1. This Civil Revision Petition arises against the judgment and decree of the Wakf Board Tribunal cum Subordinate Judge at Vellore in O.S. No.220 of 2008 dated 17.02.2016.
S.No.
Sub Headings
Paragraph Nos.
1.
Plaint
4 to 9
2.
Written Statement filed by the eighth
Defendant
10 to 11
3.
Written statement filed by the 9th
Defendant
12
4.
Gist of the written statement filed by the
20th defendant
13
5.
Judgment of the Trial Court
14 to 17
6.
Submissions
21 to 28
7.
Scope of Revision under Section 83(9) of
the Waqf Act, 1995
29 to 33
8.
Scheme of Waqf Act
34 to 49
9.
Whether notice is necessary under Section
89 of the Waqf Act, 1995
50 to 56
10.
Whether the documents dated 16.10.1946
and 07.07.1931 have a bearing on the title
of the suit property
57 to 63
11.
Whether a suit can only be filed by the
Wakf Board
64 to 74
12.
Whether the plaintiff Ahale Sunnathwal
Jamath Jogi Madam Masjid and Durga
Gudiyattam is different from Jog
The property was determined to be Wakf, with sales executed without the Wakf Board's sanction declared void, affirming the Muthavalli's right to maintain the suit.
The irreversibility of wakf property transactions based on the Wakf Act's provisions prohibits alienation, upholding the integrity of religious and charitable purposes over contested claims.
Important PointGrants by way of service inams for the purposes recognized by the muslim law as pious, religious or charitable would clothe the property with character of wakf.
The court asserted that ownership disputes under the Wakf Act do not preclude valid claims from individuals claiming title, regardless of Wakf notifications, provided they can substantiate their owne....
The court held that the Suit was within limitation and the plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs sought. The order registering the Waqf Institution Masjid and Graveyard with its property mentioned in ....
(1) In a Revision Petition scope of consideration is limited and judgment/order under challenge can be interfered only in event of there being perversity seen on face of order and if conclusion reach....
The Wakf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes regarding wakf properties, and the High Court should not interfere in such matters.
Service inam lands for religious mosque services constitute inalienable wakf property; title claims via partition/sales thereon invalid; plaintiffs must prove independent title, not rely on defence w....
The appointment of a Mutavalli by the Wakf Board is valid and binding, and the scope of judicial review in WAKF matters is limited to assessing the legality and propriety of Tribunal decisions withou....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
