Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
K. Bal Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed before this Court by way of House Motion.
2. Heard Sri A.Venkata Mayur, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Kowturu Pawan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Disaster Response and Protection Agency and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Dammaiguda Municipality, appearing for respondent No.3.
3. The facts of the case, in brief, are that petitioners claims originally one P.Bikshapathy was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs.10.22 guntas in Survey No.78/A and Ac.1-00 in Survey No.79, respectively situated at Cheeriyal Village, Kesara Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District., Out of which, he sold land admeasuring Ac.2.20 guntas in Survey No.78/A in favour of petitioner No.1 and one K.Mohan Reddy under a registered Sale Deed bearing document No.7792 of 2012, dated 11.12.2012 and their names were also mutated in the revenue records and they were also issued pattadar passbooks. Since then the petitioners are in continuous possession and enjoyment of the said land and they also constructed compound wall and laid fencing in part of the subject land and also doing cultivation as on date.
4. It is further
Authorities must follow due process before taking coercive action against property rights, ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity for hearing.
Respondents cannot interfere with retained land post partial acquisition without due procedure.
The court emphasized the necessity of due process and a joint survey before any demolition actions can be taken regarding disputed land ownership.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
