IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUJOY PAUL, RENUKA YARA
Residents Welfare Associations – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujoy Paul, C.J.
Smt. B. Rachna Reddy, learned Senior Counsel represents Sri Mohd Baseer Riyaz, learned counsel for the appellant; Sri K. Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, for respondent Nos.2 to 4; Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.5 and 6 and Sri Zeshan Adnan Mahmood, learned Standing Counsel for Pollution Control Board, for respondent No.7.
2. This intra-court appeal takes exception to the impugned order dated 15.04.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.8887 of 2025 which is interlocutory in nature.
3. If the complete relief which was claimed by the appellant, as an interim measure, has not been granted by the learned Single Judge, the appellant is at liberty to file appropriate fresh application seeking interim direction from learned Single Judge to decide the remaining portion of the interim relief considering the urgency shown.
4. The fact remains that the impugned order is an interlocutory order and does not fall within the ambit of ‘judgment’. In W.A.No.506 of 2025 and batch, dated 30.04.2025, it was held as under:
“7. Admittedly, the appellants are party respondents before th
LIC of India v. Sanjeev Builders (P) Ltd.
Midnapore Peoples’ Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Chunilal Nanda
Shyam Sel and Power Limited v. Shyam Steel Industries Limited
Interlocutory orders do not constitute 'judgments' under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, and appeals against them are not maintainable.
Writ appeals against interlocutory orders are not maintainable unless such orders constitute a 'judgment' under Letters Patent, determining rights or effects in the main case.
Interlocutory orders may not be appealed unless they qualify as 'judgments' under relevant legal standards, confirming the significant procedural limitations on appeals in such contexts.
Interlocutory orders that do not determine the rights and obligations of parties are not considered 'judgments' for appeal under Letters Patent.
Interlocutory orders are not appealable if they do not conclude pending proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.