PolaKonda Sai Raj vs Union of India - 2025 Supreme(Telangana) 777

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 777

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
PolaKonda Sai Raj – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : ABDUL AZAM KHAN
For the Respondent: GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR Deputy Solicitor General of India

Table of Content
1. petitioner's financial distress and harassment by recovery agents. (Para 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's counsel argues for legal adherence in loan recovery. (Para 4 , 5)
3. supreme court's stance on aggressive loan recovery tactics. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. court directs adherence to rbi guidelines. (Para 9)
5. writ petition disposed with directives for due process. (Para 10)

ORDER :

(SUREPALLI NANDA, J.)

Heard Sri Abdul Azam Khan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“….That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents no.3 to 18 in sending recovery agents to the residence of the Petitioner and threatening him and his family with the dire consequences, if loans are not repaid as illegal, arbitrary and against Article 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the Respondent No.3 to18 to forthwith stop sending recovery agents to the Petitioner's residence and