Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN
MGR Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Heard Mr. S.Niranjan Reddy and Sri D.Prakash Reddy, learned Senior counsel representing Sri Tarun G. Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Advocate General and Sri S.Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader and Mr. M. Mehaboob Ali, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4 and Sri Prabhakar Peri, learned Standing counsel for JNTU.
2. Lis involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same. Therefore, they were heard together and decided by way of this common order.
3. The Societies, the Colleges run by the Societies and Secretaries of the Societies are before this Court.
4. This is third round of litigation. To modify/enhance, intake of seats and merger of Courses, the petitioners submitted applications before All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and also Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU) Hyderabad. The same were considered and permissions were accorded permissions. Even then, respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 6 did not permit the petitioners from running its courses of B.Tech, CSE, with the additional intake on the basis of the merger of courses as approved by the AICTE. Therefore, petitioners filed wri
The court upheld the authority of the state to regulate educational institutions under Section 20 of the Telangana Education Act, 1982, emphasizing the need for fair and reasoned decision-making with....
The decision-making process in administrative actions must be reasoned and adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring each case is individually assessed.
The court upheld the need for a mop-up round of counselling for increased intake capacity in engineering courses, emphasizing the validity of Section 20 of the Telangana Education Act.
State-imposed conditions for educational affiliation that contradict AICTE approval undermine institutional autonomy and are unconstitutional.
B.Ed. Course – Need of new colleges looking to requirement can be said to be a relevant consideration and a decision not to recommend further recognition to new B.Ed. colleges on need basis cannot be....
The National Council for Teacher Education has the final authority in determining the intake capacity for B.Ed. courses, superseding any university restrictions, ensuring compliance with established ....
The court found that minority institutions can be regulated by the State regarding admissions while retaining their autonomy, ensuring compliance with educational standards and merit without violatin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
