ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
Vidya Jyothi Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alok Aradhe, C.J.
Mr. D.Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel; Mr. P.Sri Raghuram, learned Senior Counsel; and Mr. S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing through video conferencing; represents Mr. Tarun G.Reddy, Mr. Sairam Kanakamedala, Ms. B.Avani and Ms. Rubaina S.Khatoon, learned counsel for the appellants.
Mr. A.Sudarshan Reddy, learned Advocate General for the State.
Mr. M.Mehboob Ali, learned Standing Counsel for All India Council for Technical Education.
Mr. Abdul Quddus Mohammed, learned counsel appears for Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University
2. These intra court appeals emanate from an order dated 05.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 in W.P.No.23539 of 2024 and batch, by which the learned Single Judge has rejected the interlocutory applications filed by the appellants seeking a direction to the respondents to conduct a fresh mop-up round of TGEAPCET 2024-25 counselling for all the engineering courses for the academic year 2024-2025 by notifying all the courses offered by the appellants with full intake capacity and to permit admission in all the courses offered by the appellants.
3. With the consent of the learned c
Education Promotion Society for India v. Union of India (2019) 7 SCC 38
Asha v. PT.B.D.Sharma University of Health Sciences
Dhaya College of Engineering v. Anna University
Kanachur Islamic Education Trust (R) v. Union of India (2017) 15 SCC 702
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Registrar v. Sangam Laxmi Bai Vidyapeet (2019) 17 SCC 729
The court upheld the need for a mop-up round of counselling for increased intake capacity in engineering courses, emphasizing the validity of Section 20 of the Telangana Education Act.
The court upheld the authority of the state to regulate educational institutions under Section 20 of the Telangana Education Act, 1982, emphasizing the need for fair and reasoned decision-making with....
The decision-making process in administrative actions must be reasoned and adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring each case is individually assessed.
Interim orders allowing increases in medical college seats without proper approval are impermissible and jeopardize students' futures.
Court reaffirmed the necessity of timely processing applications for educational seat enhancements, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines under the National Medical Commission Act.
Existing allied health institutions' applications for intake increase in ongoing courses must be processed by university on merits, per prior Division Bench directions.
The distinction between the establishment of new medical colleges and the enhancement of student intake in existing colleges is critical; prior judicial rulings must not impede justified applications....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of the petitioner's request for increasing the intake of students in the MBBS course was unjustified and unsustainable, as it....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.