Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
Mohammed Fayazuddin – Appellant
Versus
Telanggana Power Generation Corporation Ltd – Respondent
ORDER :
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Heard Sri D.Ramakrishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 & 2 and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 & 4.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo 08.03.2021 issued by the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unreasonable and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for providing employment in the establishment of the 1st respondent under land looser quota immediately and appoint him as such with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice and to pass…”
3. It is specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner and his family are eking out the livelihood through the cultivation of the land in Sy.No.1106 situated at Chelpur Village, Mulugu Tq., Warangal district which is owned by Khaja Sharfuddin, who is the grandfather of the petitioner herein. The above said land was acquisitioned by
Eligibility for employment under land loser quota is restricted to the displaced person, their spouse, son, or daughter, excluding grandchildren.
Claims for employment related to land acquisition must comply with statutory provisions, and significant delays can bar such claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the petitioner to furnish required details and representation to the respondents within a specified timeframe, in accordance wi....
The State's policy providing jobs to displaced persons supersedes application deadlines, ensuring claims are honored despite timelines, supporting social justice.
Government policies for employment of displaced persons must be enforced without imposing unjust limitations, ensuring the protection of their rights and entitlements.
The court ruled that a grand-daughter qualifies as an 'other relative' under the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy of 2008, and her exclusion based on gender discrimination is impermissible.
The court established that employment entitlements under land acquisition policies must be honored as per the terms in effect at the time of acquisition, ensuring adherence to principles of natural j....
Delay and laches can bar a petitioner from seeking redress, and the court may refuse to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to protect those who have slept over wrongs and allowed illegalities to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
