Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
T.P.Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal basis for counting past service for pension benefits established. (Para 1 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner claims service reckoning for pension benefits from 1984. (Para 2) |
| 3. court observes issues with memo's reasoning and legal precedents. (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments presented regarding legal precedents on service counting. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER :
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Heard Sri S. Gopal Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I , appearing on behalf of respondents.
2. The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking the following relief
“… to pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing Memo No. 216/CE/A1/2023, dt.03-07-2023, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for reckoning the services of the petitioner with effect from 13-11-1984 when the petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in Geology (his services were regularized with effect from 12-8-1993) for the purpose of fixation of pensionary benefits as per the law laid down by Honourable High Court of Telangana in W.P. No.33936 of 2011 and batch, dt.
Prior temporary service must be counted for pension benefits, as established by law, regardless of regularization date.
Past temporary service must be counted for pension eligibility, as the right to pension is recognized as property under Article 300-A of the Constitution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
