US Constitution Trumps Presidential Tariff Powers
28 Feb 2026
Non-Compliance with Court Summons Amounts to Contempt: Allahabad HC Issues Warrant Against HDFC Life Branch Head in Cheating Bail Case
02 Mar 2026
Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
A.Karuna Sri – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Heard Sri. Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Sri P. Bhanu Prakash, learned Standing Counsel for Kakatiya University, Warangal, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. The petitioners approached this Court seeking the prayer as under:
“…to issue a wit, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in not counting the past temporary service rendered by the petitioners on daily wages & adhoc basis to reckon the same for computation of qualifying service as per G.O.Ms.No.156, Finance and Planning (FW.PEN.1) Department, dated 29.04.1983, for purpose to sanction of pension Gratuity and other retirement benefits on eve of retirement of petitioners as ordered in similar cases in G.O.Ms.No.179 (School Edu (Proc.-I) Dept dt : 18.11.2002. by not applying principles laid
Past temporary service must be counted for pension eligibility, as the right to pension is recognized as property under Article 300-A of the Constitution.
Temporary service qualifies for pension computation under Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980, as recognized by the Supreme Court and High Court precedents.
Temporary service rendered by employees must be counted for pension benefits under the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, affirming that pension rights are protected as property under Article 300-....
Temporary service must be counted as qualifying service for pension benefits under the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980.
Temporary service rendered by petitioners must be counted for pension benefits under the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980, as established by precedent.
Temporary service prior to regularization must be counted for pension eligibility to ensure fairness and justice, as established by prevailing judicial principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article