Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA
Mateti Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Heard Sri. Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 and 3, and Sri Kishore Rao Puskuru, learned Standing Counsel for TS Zilla Parishads, appearing on behalf of respondent No.4.
2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue a wit order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not counting the past temporary service rendered by the petitioner in the contingent establishment from the date of his initial appointment on 1976 to till 2018, for computation of qualifying service by reckoning contingent service rendered by the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No. 156, Finance and Planning (FW.PEN.1) Department, dated 29.04.1983, for the purpose to sanction of pension and Gratuity on even of retirement of petitioner by applying principle laid by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others in Civil Appeal No.6798 of 2019 and bat
Temporary service qualifies for pension computation under Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980, as recognized by the Supreme Court and High Court precedents.
Past temporary service must be counted for pension eligibility, as the right to pension is recognized as property under Article 300-A of the Constitution.
Temporary service rendered by employees must be counted for pension benefits under the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, affirming that pension rights are protected as property under Article 300-....
Temporary service prior to regularization must be counted for pension eligibility to ensure fairness and justice, as established by prevailing judicial principles.
Temporary service must be counted as qualifying service for pension benefits under the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980.
Temporary service rendered by petitioners must be counted for pension benefits under the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980, as established by precedent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
