Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
P.SREE SUDHA
A.P. Mahesh Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Nirmala Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court summarizes the appeals against the lower court's judgment regarding specific performance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the specifics of the agreement and the plaintiffs' claims regarding selling intentions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. the defendants dispute the validity of the agreement and contest the transactions as money transactions. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. the need for proper notice and fulfillment of requirements under the specific relief act. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. the judgment concludes with the allowances of the appeals, reversing the lower court's decision. (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT :
(P. SREE SUDHA, J.)
These appeals are filed against the Judgment and decree in O.S.No.9 of 2003, dated 05.10.2020, passed by the learned X-Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
2. Initially, respondents No.1 to 5, who are the plaintiffs in the suit, have filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale, dated 28-02-1998, which is alleged to have been executed by the appellant/defendant no.1 in favour of plaintiffs No.1 to 4 and also to direct appellant/defendant No.1 to acknowledge the possession of the plaintiffs over the suit schedule property and for consequential i
Under the Specific Relief Act, a buyer must demonstrate readiness and willingness to perform a contract, and failure to issue a prior demand notice renders a suit for specific performance unmaintaina....
A sale agreement signed solely by the vendor is enforceable, and no fixed date of performance in an agreement allows suit filing within three years of notice of refusal.
![Dudala Sarojinamma [died] VS Dudala Rama Prasad](https://cdn.supremetoday.ai/static/img/news-place-holder.png)
(1) Specific performance of agreement of sale –Alternative plea of refund of earnest amount and damage could not be bar to claiming decree for specific Performance of contract.(2) Specific performanc....
Time is an essence of the contract in specific performance cases, and plaintiffs must prove continuous readiness and willingness to perform their obligations.
The court affirmed that specific performance is a discretionary remedy, requiring the plaintiff to prove the validity of the contract and readiness to perform.
Time is of the essence in contracts for sale of immovable property; failure to act within stipulated time undermines claims for specific performance.
The court reaffirmed that in contracts for sale of immovable property, time is not inherently of the essence unless explicitly stated, and readiness must be demonstrated through conduct rather than m....
The Plaintiff's readiness and willingness to perform the contract, as well as the Defendant's failure to prove that the sale agreement was fabricated, were crucial in the court's decision to confirm ....
The subsequent rise in price and the defendant's resistance were not valid grounds to deny the relief of specific performance. The trial court rightly exercised its discretion in granting the relief ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
