Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SURENDER
M.W.R.Jayakar A1 – Appellant
Versus
State Of A.P., Rep. By Inspector Of Police, ACB – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Crl.A.No.507 of 2012 is filed by the ACB, questioning the order passed by the II Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Hydeabad, in CC.No.08 of 2010, dated 31.12.2011, in acquitting Accused No.1 for the offences under Sections 468, r/w.34 of IPC, 471 r/w.34 of IPC, and 120(B) r/w.34 of IPC, and acquitting Accused No.2 of all the offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w.13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, r/w. Sections 109, 120-B, 201, 468, 471, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Crl.A.No.41 of 2012 is filed by Accused No.1, questioning the conviction recorded by the II Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Hydeabad, in CC.No.08 of 2010, dated 31.12.2011, for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
3. Since Accused No.2 died, this Court, in Crl.A.No.507 of 2012 by order dated 02.08.2022, dismissed the appeal against A2 as abated.
4. This Court has heard the appeals filed by A1/appellant in Crl.A.No.41 of 2012 and by the State against A1 in Crl.A.No.507 of 2012.
5. The case of the prosecution is that PW.1 is a practicing advocate. One Buchirami Reddy (plaintiff) and 4 others filed suit OS.No.518 of 1994 in
In appeals against acquittal, the prosecution must prove the demand for bribe beyond reasonable doubt; failure to do so results in upholding the acquittal.
The appellate court can reverse an acquittal if evidence of bribery and the demand for illegal payments is established beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing that both parties bear the burden in a plea....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the demand for and acceptance of illegal gratification beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasized that mere recovery....
Point of law: So far as the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act is concerned, it trite that even the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act can be drawn only after demand for and acceptanc....
Point of law: So far as the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act is concerned, it trite that even the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act can be drawn only if an accused person has accep....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
