Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SURENDER
G. Narayana Reddy (Rtd) – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. SURENDER, J.
1. This criminal appeal is filed by the appellant, aggrieved by the judgment dated 14.10.2009 in C.C. No. 14 of 2003, passed by the Additional Special Learned Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 13 (1)(e) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months.
2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant/accused served as the Assistant Director of Agriculture from 30.4.1991 to 31.5.1999. On credible information that the appellant, while working in various capacities in the Agricultural Department and as Assistant Director of Agriculture, had acquired substantial assets in his name and the names of his dependents, a case was registered under Cr. No. 5/ACB-HR/97 on 12.3.1997. The case was registered under sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, on the authorization of the Additional Director, ACB, Hyderabad,
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
