Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SURENDER
G. Narayana Reddy (Rtd) – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed over prior conviction (Para 1) |
| 2. details of appellant's assets and investigation (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legality of prosecution without sanction post-retirement (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. dispute over valuation of assets (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. arguments regarding vehicle ownership (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. valuation of household articles in assets (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. defense on household articles attribution (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. investigation findings on gold and silver ornaments (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. analysis of cash found during searches (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. determination of income from salary (Para 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
| 11. establishment of household expenditure figures (Para 139 , 140 , 141) |
| 12. conclusion based on calculations involving assets and income (Para 231 , 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 , 236) |
JUDGMENT :
K. SURENDER, J.
1. This criminal appeal is filed by the appellant, aggrieved by the judgment dated 14.10.2009 in C.C. No. 14 of 2003, passed by the Additional Special Learned Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 13
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
