SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 798

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUREPALLI NANDA
Gajjela Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : NAYAKAWADI RAMESH
For the Respondent:ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL

ORDER :

SUREPALLI NANDA, J.

Heard Sri Nayakawadi Ramesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader representing learned Additional Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the Rc.No.98/A5/2019 dated 21.08.2022 wherein rejecting the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (SGT) (Telugu Medium T/M) pursuant to the DSC Notification 1998 though he secured 55 marks more than the cut-off marks prescribed in BC-B category is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and set aside the same with a consequential direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (T/M) in terms of the Letter addressed by the 3rd respondent vide Lr.No.98/A5/2019 dated 26.04.2023 by taking into consideration of the orders passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A.No.144 of 2006 dated 04.12.2009 along with others in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top