Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK
B.Siddappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:
“…to declare the impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.6441/B2/(B4)/2009-1, dated 15.09.2012 of the 4th respondent by rejecting the case of the applicants for appointment to the post of Secondary Grade Teachers in DSC-2008, though, the applicants are fully eligible and entitled to hold the post of Secondary Grade Teachers as per their Educational Qualifications as was considered in the Memo No.677/Trg.3/2004-1, dated 11.02.2004 of the then State of Andhra Pradesh and also several candidates were permitted in the selections and appointments from DSC-1999 onwards, even then, the respondents were rejected the claims of the applicants for selection and appointment in DSC-2008 in Medak District the action of the respondents is highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and also in violation of principles of natural justice and declare the same as bad in law and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the applicants for appointment for the post of Secondary Grade Teachers as per their selections in DSC-2008 in Medak District and w
The court found that eligibility for teaching positions must align with current qualifications established by the applicable recruitment rules, which overrode previous allowances.
Altering recruitment eligibility criteria after process commencement is impermissible; prior qualifications obtained disallow subsequent lower-level qualifications for appointment eligibility.
The court upheld the principle that candidates' eligibility should be evaluated based on merit aligned with previous judicial orders, emphasizing fairness and adherence to established criteria.
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot challenge the process or regulations post-selection, establishing a principle of acquiescence in recruitment law.
Though the rejection of the candidatures of the petitioners appear to be on the ground of not acquiring the TET qualification within a particular age, it is an admitted fact that all the petitioners ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
