Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J. SREENIVAS RAO, J
Mohd. Chand Pasha S/o Late Mohd. Ismail – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent no.6 asserts rightful claim based on will and possession. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court examines revenue records and prior claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court highlights the importance of timely appeals in revenue matters. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. fraudulent entries in records can be challenged at any time. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. revised jurisdiction under new law requires case reassignment. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 6. order set aside; case remitted for reconsideration by special tribunal. (Para 28 , 29) |
ORDER :
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the orders of the 3rd respondent dated 27.10.2018 in Revision Petition No.D1/521/2016, in confirming the order passed by the 4th respondent in Appeal File No.A/1482/2015 dated 19.10.2015 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution India and contrary to the provisions of Records of Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act and quash the same…”
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner and possessor of land to an extent of Acs.0.1
Entries in revenue records made fraudulently lack legal validity, and administrative authorities must provide reasons for their decisions to ensure justice.
The scope of judicial review is confined to decision making process and not the decision per se.
The court affirmed that a revision petition under the ROR Act can be filed without a time limit, emphasizing the need for a fresh enquiry into land ownership claims, especially in cases of alleged fr....
The main legal point established is the requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing orders under Sec.5(3) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattedar Passb....
The court emphasized that revenue authorities must respect the principles of natural justice and cannot alter records without notice, especially when a civil suit is pending.
Petitioners cannot seek restoration of land title based on an unregistered agreement; proper legal procedures must be followed for title validation, and corrections made in revenue records are upheld....
The court emphasized the necessity of proper notice to all interested parties in land disputes, ruling that orders passed against deceased persons are null and void.
Claims for land ownership after significant delays must be addressed by civil courts, as administrative bodies cannot adjudicate on disputed titles without violating established rights.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
