IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SARATH
Nithya Muktha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition questioning prior orders. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioners' claim of ownership over land. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. reliance on legal precedents. (Para 6) |
| 4. respondents assert rightful claim. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's analysis of petitioners' contentions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. legal interpretation of ror act and agreements. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 22) |
| 7. petitioners' inability to establish valid claim. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. court's position on due process and authority. (Para 23 , 26) |
| 9. conclusion of dismissal without interference. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
ORDER :
K.SARATH, J.
Heard Sri K. Jagadishwar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Smt S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Sri N. Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the respondent No.6 and perused the material on record.
2. This writ petition is filed questioning the order passed by the respondent No.2 in Case No.F2/Spl.Tribunal/0229/2021 dated 06.07.2021 and the order passed by the respondent No.5 in Case No.B/6119/2017 dated 07.02.2018 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent Nos.3 and 5 to restore the entries in the revenue records i
Thripuravaram Krishna Reddy vs. Joint Collector, Cuddapah
Gopathi Manikyam vs. Joint Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy
G. Prabhakar vs. State of Telangana
Chinnam Pandurangam vs. Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal
Veeramachaneni Ramchander Rao vs. Tahsildar, Chityal Mandal, Nalgonda
Kranti Associates Private Limited vs. Masood Ahmed Khan
Dharampal Satyapal Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Gauhati
Mukhala Kotilingam (died) by LRs vs. Joint Collector, R.R.District, Hyderabad and Others
Petitioners cannot seek restoration of land title based on an unregistered agreement; proper legal procedures must be followed for title validation, and corrections made in revenue records are upheld....
The court affirmed that a revision petition under the ROR Act can be filed without a time limit, emphasizing the need for a fresh enquiry into land ownership claims, especially in cases of alleged fr....
In land administration, proper legal procedures must be followed for record mutations, ensuring all parties' rights are respected.
Revenue authorities must issue individual notices before altering land records to uphold natural justice, as failure to do so renders the action arbitrary and illegal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.