IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J.
Ravi Venkata Ramana and Others - Appellants
Versus
State of Telangana and Others - Respondents
W.P. No. 22877 of 2023
Decided On : 14-10-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assignment of land and procedural compliance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on unreasonable delay in cancellation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on procedural irregularities and delay. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. legal principles regarding reasonable time for actions. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusion to set aside the impugned order. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER :
1. The impugned proceedings No.E1/1064-2016-1 dated 06.06.2023 was passed by the respondent No.2-District Collector, Sangareddy District, in exercise of his jurisdiction under Section 166 -B of A.P. (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli, cancelling the assignment of the land admeasuring Ac.5.00 guntas situated in Sy.No.9 of Osman Nagar Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, granted to the original assignee vide assignment proceedings No.B/1237/2002 dated 28.12.2002 issued by the respondent No.5 – Tahsildar, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.
2. The facts of the case, as pleaded by the petitioners, in brief, are as under:
(a) Originally one viz. Govu Shankaraiah S/o. Mallaiah, a Freedom Fighter made an application for assignment of land to the respondent No.5. The application was considered by the respondent No.5 vide Proceedings No.B/1237/2002 dated 28.12.2002 and the assignment orders were issued assigning Ac.5.00 guntas land (hereinafter referred to as assigned land) in favour of Sri Govu Shankaraiah in Sy.No.9, Osman Nagar Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal. Thereafter, the said Shankaraiah was also issued Final Patta Certificate by the respondent No.5 vide proceedings No.B/1237/2002. Consequently, the respondent No.5 also issued patta passbooks and title deeds to Govu Shankaraiah vide Patta Pass Book No.360 and Nos.425914 and 446347 respectively and his name was entered as pattadar and possessor in pahanies, which is evident from Pahani for the year 2006-2007.
(b) The said Shankaraiah made an application to the respondent authorities seeking permission to alienate the assigned land and accordingly a No Objection Certificate was issued by the respondent No.2-Collector on 17.05.2005 vide letter No.E1/3072/2005. Thereafter, the original assignee, Govu Shankaraiah, sold the property to Syed Jameel and Syed Naseem by way of registered sale deed bearing Document No.31580/2006, dated 21.12.2006 as per the NOC issued by the Collector, Medak. Thereafter the said Shankaraiah died in the year 2007.
(c) Subsequently, Syed Jameel and Syed Naseem sold the assigned land to Ravi Venkataramana (petitioner No.1) by way of registered Sale Deed bearing document No.8229/2009 dated 16.09.2009, who, in turn, sold the assigned land to the petitioners No.4 and 5 under registered sale deeds bearing documents Nos.11714/2009 and 11715/2009 dated 29.12.2009.
(d) While so, the respondent No.3-Joint Collector, Sangareddy issued a show cause notice No.E1/1064/2016-1 dated 26.03.2016 to the petitioners stating that the Tahsildar, Ramchandrapuram, has not followed procedure in assigning the land in favour of freedom fighters; no permission was obtained by the District Collector from the Government for assigning the land to freedom fighters; further the assignee is native of Sangareddy whereas the land that has been allotted is in Ramachandrapuram Mandal; the assignee has given an affidavit before the Mandal Revenue Officer, Ramchandrapuram, stating that he was allotted Government land at Cheriyal village of Sangareddy Mandal under freedom fighter quota and without verifying the said fact, the MRO has made assignment in Osman Nagar; the MRO without obtaining any permission from HMDA assigned the land to the assignee, though the land comes under purview of HMDA limits; Shankaraiah sold the land to Syed Jameel and Syed Naseem within four years from the date of assignment whereas as per G.O.Ms.No.1045 Revenue (Assn.I) Department dated 15.12.2004 the freedom fighters are free to sell away the assigned lands only after ten years; the assignee obtained NOC from
Collector and others vs. P. Mangamma and others
State of Maharashtra and another vs. Rattanlal
State of Gujarat vs. Patil Raghav Natha and others
Mohamad Kavi Mohamad Amin vs. Fatmabai Ibrahim
Santoshkumar Shivgonda Patil and others vs. Balasaheb Tukaram Shevale and others
State of Punjab and others vs. Bhatinda District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd.
Authorities must exercise cancellation powers within a reasonable time, especially when no fraud is present and ownership has significantly changed over time.
The authority can cancel land assignments based on misrepresentation or fraud without a time limit, as established under Board Standing Orders 15 (18) (1).
The central legal point established in the judgment is that assignment patta granted prior to 1973 cannot be cancelled beyond a period of three years from the date of assignment, and even on the grou....
District Collector lacks jurisdiction to cancel pre-1973 land assignments; authority vests with Commissioner of Land Administration per RSO-15(2)(xi).
The State's power to cancel land assignments must be exercised within a reasonable timeframe, and failure to provide original assignment documentation undermines the validity of such cancellations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.