Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUJOY PAUL, NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
M.Karthik – Appellant
Versus
Consortium of NLUs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s rank and domicile status affecting admission. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding domicile quota eligibility. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. university's stance on application and quota eligibility. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. state's control over nalsar university and related precedents. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. interpretation of article 371-d and presidential order. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. constitutionality of nalsar act in relation to reorganisation act. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. precedential considerations based on related judgments. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. resisting the induction of the petitioner due to existing admissions. (Para 21) |
| 9. petition dismissed due to lack of substance. (Para 22) |
ORDER :
Sujoy Paul, J.
In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the constitutionality of Section 5-A of the National Academy of Legal Studies and Research University Act , 1998 (as amended by Act No.7 of 2021) (for short, NALSAR Act). The challenge is also mounted to G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 04.12.2014, but at the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner abandoned the relief against the said GO.
Facts:
2. The petitioner is resident of Tirupati and domicile of
A university must be under the control of the state for domicile reservation provisions to apply; mere residency does not confer rights to consider for a quota.
The court upheld the constitutionality of domicile-based reservations in higher education, affirming state authority to promote equitable access while maintaining adherence to Articles 14 and 15 of t....
In order to ensure equal opportunities for quality higher education to all students in the successor States, the existing admission quotas in all government or private, aided or unaided, institutions....
Notification for starting a new education institution - Permission for starting new colleges can be granted only to co-operative institutions, which have sufficient financial background and prior exp....
The exercise of discretion by the State Government under Section 109(3)(d) of the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 must be judicious and reasons must be recorded for granting or refusing Let....
The court recognized the validity of degrees obtained through distance mode from a state university, ruling that discriminatory treatment against similarly qualified candidates violates constitutiona....
The amended definition of 'Non-Resident Indian' under state law is constitutional, prioritizing statutory eligibility over broader interpretations and reinforcing the State's authority in regulating ....
The restriction imposed by the 2016 Rules on the right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) is reasonable and thus saved by clause (6) of Article 19.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
