Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Salla Chandra Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over ownership and possession of agricultural lands (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. challenges to jurisdiction and claims of rights under past decrees (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. arguments on the validity of the compromise decree and legislative mandates (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. legal inadequacy of unregistered agreements to confer ownership (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 33) |
| 5. compromise decrees requiring registration to confer rights (Para 28 , 29 , 32 , 34) |
| 6. judicial determination of title and possession issues reserved for civil court (Para 35 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. refusal to adjudicate on title due to unresolved factual disputes (Para 44 , 46) |
| 8. final order dismissing writ petitions and encouraging civil remedies (Para 47 , 48) |
ORDER :
Gadi Praveen Kumar, J.
1. Since the issues raised in both the Writ Petitions arise out of the very same impugned proceeding Rc.No.B/145/2018 dated 20.02.2018, they are taken up together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The Writ Petitions, W.P.No.7272 of 2019 and W.P.No.21577 of 2019, are filed challenging the Proceedings Rc.No.B/145/2018 dated 20.02.2018 issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer (
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
