Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Kamsani Anjali – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for habeas corpus based on illegal detention claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's assertion of wrongful detention under the jj act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. respondent's argument on the role of cwc in detention matters. (Para 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. discussion on maintainability of writs and locus standi. (Para 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 5. court's clarification on legality of detention under jj act. (Para 21 , 25) |
| 6. right to autonomy versus state's duty to protect. (Para 30 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. conclusion on writ maintainability and potential risks of re-victimization. (Para 46 , 47 , 49) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioner seeks a Writ of Habeas Corpus declaring the action of the State respondents in illegally detaining the alleged detenues in the respondent No.6/State Home and a direction to the State Home to produce the alleged detenues in the Court and to set the detenues free.
2. The petitioner claims to be a close friend of the detenues and claims to know the detenues for seven years having lived with them in the Child Care Institution, Prajwala (an organization registered under Andhra Pradesh (Telangana) Area Public Societies Registration Act) (‘Prajwala’) and the State Home. The detenues are
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
