Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
J.SREENIVAS RAO
Parayitam Anand Sharma, S/o. Vishnumurthy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana Rep. by P.P., High Court at Hyderabad, Through P.S. Amangal, Ranga Reddy district – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments made by both parties (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court’s analysis and observations on claims (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 12 , 18) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding misuse of sc/st act (Para 9 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. conclusion and order to quash the proceedings (Para 20 , 21) |
ORDER :
J. SREENIVAS RAO, J.
This Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings in SC.SPL.No.256 of 2022 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge-cum-Sessions Court for the trial of SC/ST Cases, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, registered for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015 (for short, ‘the Act’).
2. Brief facts of the case :
Respondent No.2/de facto complainant lodged a complaint on 04.06.2021 stating that his father, Chintakindi Laxmaiah, purchased the land to an extent of Ac.3.15 gts. in Sy.Nos.32, 33 and 73 from the petitioner through a plain paper (sada bainama) for total sale consideration of Rs.1,20,000/- and he paid the said amount by way of in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
