Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. Lakshman
K. VENUGOPAL REDDY, HYD – Appellant
Versus
NECTAR LABORATORIES LIMITED, HYD – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. Lakshman, J.
Heard Dr. P. Bhaskara Mohan, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Vikram Pooserla, learned Senior counsel, representing Mr. Malipeddi Abhinay Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, Mr. N. Jeevan Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Mr. Maneesh Mahinwith, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.9. There is no representation on behalf of respondent Nos.4, 6, 8, 10 to 17. Notice served on respondent No.5 returned un-served with an endorsement ‘addressee left’.
2. The present appeal is filed under Section 10F of the COMPANIES ACT , 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) challenging the order dated 24.02.2012 passed by the Company Law Board (herein after ‘CLB’), Additional Principal Bench, Chennai, in Company Petition No. 19 of 2008 filed by the appellant herein, who is the founder-Director of respondent No.1 Company, under Sections 397 and 398 of the Act, seeking relief against alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement by respondents Nos.2 to 7.
3. FACTS OF THE CASE
i) The appellant, a founder director of M/s. Nectar Laboratories Limited (herein after Company), instituted Company Petition No. 19 of 2008 befor
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
