SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1123

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.TUKARAMJI
H. Lokesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : B Vamshidhar Reddy
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

ORDER:

N.TUKARAMJI, J.

I have heard Mr. B. Chandrasen Reddy, learned Senior Counsel argued on behalf of Mr. B.Vamsidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Sama Sandheep Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Medical Council appearing on behalf of respondent No.2.

2. Since the contentions raised, the issues requiring consideration, and the questions of law involved in these matters are substantially analogous, all the petitions were heard together and are accordingly being disposed of by this common order.

3. Criminal Petition No.7669 of 2025 is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘the BNSS ’) for quashment of proceedings in Crime No.393 of 2025 on the file of the Police Station, KPHB Colony, Cyberabad District against the petitioner/accused.

Criminal Petition No.7691 of 2025 is filed under Section 528 of the BNSS for quashment of proceedings in Crime No.222 of 2025 on the file of the Police Station, Sangareddy Town, Sangareddy District against the petitioner/accused.

Criminal Petition No.7668 of 2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top