IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
G.K.Sampath Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana rep. by its Chief Secretary, Hyderabad – Respondent
ORDER :
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, J.
The present Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:
“…to issue "Writ of Quo Warranto" terminating the services of the respondent No.2 from the post of Director (Finance) in the Singareni Collieries Company Limited, since his selection and appointment and consequent extension is against Selection Rules and in not bearing appointment order from 05.12.2023 in and the interest of justice consequently direct for recover of payment drawn by the respondent No.2 and pass…”
2. Heard G.K. Sampath Kumar, party-in-person, learned Government Pleader for Services-II, appearing for respondents No.1 and 6, Sri E. Madhan Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri Sujith Jaiswal, learned counsel for respondent No.2, learned Standing Counsel for Central Government, appearing for respondents No.3, 4 and 5, learned Additional Advocate General, representing Sri P. Sri Harsha Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Singareni Collieries, appearing for respondent No.7 and Sri Jogram Tejavat, learned counsel for the respondent No.8.
3. The petitioner submits that he is a practicing advocate and ex-employee of Singareni Collieries Company Limited. Since there are
Retd. Armed F Medical Association and Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Umapathi Choudhary Vs. State of Bihar
B. Srinivas Reddy vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board Employees Association and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.