Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SARATH
Panga Ramakrishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to resumption of assigned land (Para 1) |
| 2. assignee's rights and government obligations (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. government's case regarding land cultivation (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. limits of resumption authority and reasonable timeframes (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court's directive on land acquisition procedures (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. closure of miscellaneous petitions (Para 15) |
ORDER :
K. SARATH, J.
This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.4 in passing the order in Proc.B/8024/16, dated 19.12.2016 as confirmed by the respondent Nos.3 and 2 in Appeal No.D2/133/2017, dated 06.05.2017 and Revision Case No.F2/1675/2017, dated 25.11.2017 respectively, directing to resume the assigned agricultural land of the petitioner admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.671 (671/23) situated at Suryapet Village and Mandal, Suryapet District as arbitrary and illegal and requested to set aside the impugned orders.
2. Heard Sri Pasham Ravindra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohd. Habeebuddin, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. Learned Counsel for th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
