IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA
M Venkat Reddy – Appellant
Versus
M Sathi Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RENUKA YARA, J.
Heard Sri T. Sharath, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Tarun G. Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Perused the entire record.
2. This Second Appeal is preferred aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 16.11.2023 in I.A.No.2799 of 2023 in A.S.SR.No.13388 of 2023 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar (‘first appellate Court’), wherein the application filed to condone delay of 12 days in filing the first appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 02.08.2023 in I.A.No.269 of 2022 in O.S.No.21 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar (‘trial Court’), whereby the petition filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was allowed rejecting the plaint, was dismissed.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant herein filed suit vide O.S.No.21 of 2016 on the file of the trial Court seeking cancellation of judgment and decree in O.S.No.288 of 1981, dated 30.03.1982 on the file of the District Munsiff West and South Court, Hyderabad, along with consequential reliefs to declare sale deeds i.e., sale
N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy
Popat Bahiru Govardhane v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.