IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO
P. Saraswathi – Appellant
Versus
Samreddy Ram Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J.
1. This appeal is filed by the claim petitioners under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988, which arises out of an award passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal – cum – XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in MVOP.No. 203 of 2015 dated 05.11.2021.
2.1. Appellants - petitioners have filed claim petition under Section 166 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1989 (M.V.Act) and Rule 455 of the A.P. Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 read with Section 163-B of M.V.Act seeking compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- from respondent Nos.1 to 3 on account of the death of P.Lokesh in a motor vehicle accident, which took place on 02.12.2014.
2.2. Appellant No.1-petitioner No.1 is the wife, appellant Nos.2 and 3-petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the son and daughter of Late P.Lokesh.
3. On 02.12.2014 at about 09.00 hours, P.Lokesh was proceeding on scooter bearing No.AP-28-D-9362 from Hayatnagar to Torrur, when he reached near Balreddy Poultry farms at that time one Hero Honda Passion motor Cycle bearing No.AP-29-BU- 2000 came in rash and negligent manner with high speed and dashed him, due to which he fell down on the ro
Janabai Vs. M/s. I.C.I.C.I Lambord Insurance Company Ltd.
Bimla Devi & Ors. V. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Ors.
Salar Varma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
National Insurance Company Vs. Pranay Sethi
Magma General Insurance Company Vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.