Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P.SAM KOSHY, K. SUJANA
Margadarsi Financiers – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP., Rep. Byits Authorised Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against petitioners under rbi act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. procedural developments leading to quashing petition. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 3. details on government actions and court involvement. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. financial returns of petitioners and acknowledgment. (Para 8 , 9 , 14) |
| 5. court's need for public interest considerations. (Para 10 , 20) |
| 6. death of petitioner affecting proceedings. (Para 11 , 16) |
| 7. responses from states and implications. (Para 17 , 22) |
| 8. arguments about liability and representation. (Para 18 , 21) |
| 9. vicarious liability issues in criminal proceedings. (Para 19 , 39) |
| 10. state's recognition of abatement of proceedings. (Para 37 , 50) |
| 11. criminal liability and ownership distinctions. (Para 38 , 45 , 46) |
| 12. final order for quashing and abatement. (Para 56) |
ORDER :
P.Sam Koshy, J.
Heard Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Siddarth Luthra, & Mr. S. Nagamuthu, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. K.V. Raman, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. B. Rajeshwar Reddy, learned Government Pleader for the State of A.P. for respondent No.1, Mr. L. Ravichander, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. K. Rathanga Pani Reddy & B. Shiva Ram Sharma, for respondent
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
