Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Gumpu Sri Vishnu Teja, Vishnu Teja – Appellant
Versus
State of Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case against the petitioner. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents' counter allegations and evidence. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against allegations. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's observations on evidence and procedure. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. judicial review of the disciplinary decision. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. conclusion and order set by the court. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J.
Heard Mr. C. Damodar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mr. C. Ruthwik Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. B.S. Prasad, learned Senior Counsel appearing for M/s Pearl Law Associates for Respondents.
2. The case of petitioner is that he entered the service of respondent bank in 2009 as Assistant and subsequently, on 28-04-2013, he was transferred and posted as Junior Assistant at SBI, Ganesh Nagar Branch, Mahabubnagar, where he rendered dedicated service to respondent bank and as a token of his hard work, he was promoted as Senior Assistant and posted at SBI, Main Branch, Clock Tower, Mahabubnagar and directed him to report on 01-06-2018, after undergoing training, as such, he was relieved from Ganesh Nagar Branch on 20-05-2018 itself. The further case of petitioner is
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
