Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Kalvakuntla Taraka Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir details and allegations against petitioners. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding evidence and investigation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defining elements of offences under ipc and it act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. assessment of fir allegations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. judicial precedents on quashing firs. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. inherent power to prevent abuse of process. (Para 30) |
| 7. quashing of fir granted. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 8. final order and disposal of applications. (Para 33) |
ORDER :
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.
The Criminal Petition is for quashing of the records related to FIR.No.590 of 2024 on the file of P.S. Medipally, Rachakonda, registered against the petitioners pursuant to the complaint made by the respondent No.2 for the alleged offences under sections 505(2) of The INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (‘IPC’) and sections 66C and 66D of The Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘IT Act’).
2. The petitioner No.1/accused No.1 is a Member of the Legislative Assembly (‘MLA’) from Sircilla Assembly Constituency, State of Telangana and is the working President of the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) Political Party. The petitio
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
